Quadro K2200M vs Quadro M3000M
In this comparison between Quadro K2200M and Quadro M3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2200M will be the best choice, for others Quadro M3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2200M
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M | Quadro M3000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M3000M has 15% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro M3000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro M3000M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro K2200M and Quadro M3000M are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 383 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M and Quadro M3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 12 MHz higher, than Quadro M3000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro K2200M and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Quadro K2200M and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 61% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 82% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro K2200M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M | Quadro M3000M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Code name | GM107 | GM204 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 19 July 2014 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1,024 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 67.20 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 2,150 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Shader Model | 5 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | 5.2 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 253 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | + |
Display Port | 1.2 | 1.2 |
3D Vision Pro | + | + |
Mosaic | + | + |
nView Display Management | + | + |
Check Price |