Quadro K2200M vs Quadro M4000

When comparing Quadro K2200M and Quadro M4000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K2200M and Quadro M4000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Quadro K2200M

Quadro M4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro K2200M	Quadro M4000
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	120 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
		Check Price

Quadro M4000 has 84% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro M4000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M4000 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro M4000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 106 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
Quadro K2200M and Quadro M4000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 996 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	35−40
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	6−7	16−18
4K / 2160p	5−6	10−11
low / 720p	35−40	60−65
medium / 1080p	24−27	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than Quadro K2200M.
high / 1080p	30−35	55−60
ultra / 1080p	27−30	45−50
QHD / 1440p	10−12	35−40
4K / 2160p	7−8	18−20
low / 720p	65−70	100−110
medium / 1080p	35−40	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Quadro K2200M.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K2200M and Quadro M4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	250−260
medium / 768p	200−210	220−230
ultra / 1080p	110−120	180−190
QHD / 1440p	85−90	110−120
4K / 2160p	45−50	70−75
high / 768p	160−170	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Quadro K2200M.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
Quadro K2200M and Quadro M4000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	75−80	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro K2200M.
high / 1080p	24−27	45−50
ultra / 1080p	21−24	40−45
QHD / 1440p	18−20	27−30
4K / 2160p	7−8	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	80−85
medium / 1080p	24−27	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Quadro K2200M.
high / 1080p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	24−27	45−50
QHD / 1440p	14−16	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	120−130	180−190
medium / 1080p	70−75	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Fortnite is 61% more, than Quadro K2200M.
high / 1080p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	24−27	45−50
QHD / 1440p	12−14	30−35
4K / 2160p	12−14	24−27
low / 720p	65−70	100−110
medium / 1080p	35−40	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than Quadro K2200M.
low / 768p	100−110	140−150
medium / 768p	90−95	120−130
high / 1080p	40−45	70−75
ultra / 1080p	16−18	30−35
QHD / 1440p	6−7	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than Quadro K2200M.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−11	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
low / 720p	40−45	65−70
medium / 1080p	16−18	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 82% more, than Quadro K2200M.
low / 768p	120−130	130−140
medium / 1080p	110−120	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro K2200M.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	100−110
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Quadro K2200M.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−11	16−18
QHD / 1440p	1−2	10−11
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
low / 720p	35−40	65−70
medium / 1080p	20−22	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than Quadro K2200M.
low / 768p	70−75	130−140
medium / 768p	45−50	85−90
high / 1080p	24−27	45−50
ultra / 1080p	14−16	24−27
4K / 2160p	8−9	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than Quadro K2200M.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	50−55
high / 768p	55−60	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro K2200M.

Full Specs

	Quadro K2200M	Quadro M4000
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GM107	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	19 July 2014	29 June 2015
Pipelines	640	1664
Core clock speed	667 MHz	773 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	26.68	80.39
Floating-point performance	853.8 gflops	2,573 gflops
Length		241 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s
DirectX	12	12
Shader Model	5	5
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	5.0	5.2
SLI options		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		299 Mh/s
Optimus	+
Display Port	1.2
3D Vision Pro	+	+
Mosaic	+	+
nView Display Management	+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6		+
		Check Price

Quadro K2200M vs Quadro M4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares