Quadro K2200M vs Quadro P400

In this comparison between Quadro K2200M and Quadro P400 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2200M will be the best choice, for others Quadro P400 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K2200M

Quadro P400 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro K2200M	Quadro P400
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	30 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	3x mini-DisplayPort
		Check Price

Quadro K2200M has 116% more power consumption, than Quadro P400.
Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro P400 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K2200M and Quadro P400 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro P400 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P400 is 561 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P400 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 1004 MHz higher, than Quadro P400.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	7−8
ultra / 1080p	12−14	4−5
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	35−40	18−20
medium / 1080p	24−27	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	30−35	12−14
ultra / 1080p	27−30	10−12
QHD / 1440p	10−12	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	27−30
medium / 1080p	35−40	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 156% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	230−240	140−150
medium / 768p	200−210	110−120
ultra / 1080p	110−120	55−60
QHD / 1440p	85−90	30−35
4K / 2160p	45−50	27−30
high / 768p	160−170	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 84% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	50−55	21−24
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	120−130	85−90
medium / 768p	100−110	60−65
ultra / 1080p	75−80	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	24−27	9−10
ultra / 1080p	21−24	8−9
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	4−5
low / 720p	50−55	21−24
medium / 1080p	24−27	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 136% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	30−35	16−18
ultra / 1080p	24−27	10−12
QHD / 1440p	14−16	−
low / 720p	120−130	65−70
medium / 1080p	70−75	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 110% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	30−35	12−14
ultra / 1080p	24−27	12−14
QHD / 1440p	12−14	2−3
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	65−70	27−30
medium / 1080p	35−40	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	100−110	55−60
medium / 768p	90−95	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	7−8
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 106% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	12−14	5−6
ultra / 1080p	10−11	3−4
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	14−16
medium / 1080p	16−18	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 185% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	120−130	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	110−120	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Quadro P400.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	10−11	8−9
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	20−22	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 109% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	70−75	27−30
medium / 768p	45−50	18−20
high / 1080p	24−27	10−11
ultra / 1080p	14−16	7−8
4K / 2160p	8−9	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 135% more, than Quadro P400.
low / 768p	90−95	85−90
medium / 768p	60−65	45−50
ultra / 1080p	40−45	21−24
high / 768p	55−60	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Quadro P400.

Full Specs

	Quadro K2200M	Quadro P400
Architecture	Maxwell	Pascal
Code name	GM107	GP107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	19 July 2014	7 February 2017
Pipelines	640	256
Core clock speed	667 MHz	1228 MHz
Boost Clock		1252 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	26.68	20.03
Floating-point performance	853.8 gflops	679.9 gflops
Length		145 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	4008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	32.06 GB/s
DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	5.0	6.1
Optimus	+
Display Port	1.2
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
nView Display Management	+
		Check Price

Quadro K2200M vs Quadro P400

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares