Quadro K2200M vs Radeon Pro 450
When choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro 450, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro 450.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro 450 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 85% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro 450 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 133 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 68 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 44% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 38% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 41% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 31% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon Pro 450. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro 450 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 11 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 19 July 2014 | 27 October 2016 |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 800 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 32.00 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |