Quadro K2200M vs Radeon Pro 555
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro 555. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro 555. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon Pro 555 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro 555 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 555 has 15% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro 555 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 188 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 68 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro 555 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 22% more, than Radeon Pro 555. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro 555 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
| Code name | GM107 | Polaris 21 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 19 July 2014 | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 40.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 1,306 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 81.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |