Quadro K2200M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro WX 3200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro WX 3200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro K2200M
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 65 Watt.
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 415 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 988 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 52% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 22% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 52% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 38% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 70% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 19 July 2014 | 26 September 2019 |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 1082 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 41.44 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |