Quadro K2200M vs Radeon Pro WX 4150
When comparing Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro WX 4150, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K2200M
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4150 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 4150 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - with Polaris.
- Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4150 is 1988 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 105% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 116% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 80% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 94% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 112% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 61% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 94% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 11 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 19 July 2014 | 1 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | DirectX 12 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |