Quadro K2200M vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
When choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro WX 5100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro WX 5100.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon Pro WX 5100
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 15% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 5100 is 46 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 12 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro WX 5100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Quadro K2200M and Radeon Pro WX 5100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Fortnite is 61% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Metro Exodus is 82% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro K2200M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Ellesmere |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 19 July 2014 | 18 November 2016 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 713 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1086 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 121.6 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 3,892 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 250 Mh/s | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Similar compares
- Quadro K2200M vs FirePro S9050
- Quadro K2200M vs GRID M60 8Q
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs FirePro S9050
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs GRID M60 8Q
- Quadro K2200M vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Quadro K2200M vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics