Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R7 260

In this comparison between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 260 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2200M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 260 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K2200M

Radeon R7 260 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro K2200M	Radeon R7 260
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
		Check Price

Radeon R7 260 has 76% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 260 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 260 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 260 - with GCN 2.0.
Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 260 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 3387 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 260.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	14−16
ultra / 1080p	12−14	8−9
QHD / 1440p	6−7	3−4
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	35−40	30−35
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	30−35	24−27
ultra / 1080p	27−30	20−22
QHD / 1440p	10−12	7−8
4K / 2160p	7−8	5−6
low / 720p	65−70	50−55
medium / 1080p	35−40	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	230−240	200−210
medium / 768p	200−210	170−180
ultra / 1080p	110−120	95−100
QHD / 1440p	85−90	50−55
4K / 2160p	45−50	30−33
high / 768p	160−170	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	50−55	35−40
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	100−110	90−95
ultra / 1080p	75−80	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 13% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	24−27	16−18
ultra / 1080p	21−24	16−18
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	6−7
low / 720p	50−55	35−40
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 36% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	30−35	24−27
ultra / 1080p	24−27	18−20
QHD / 1440p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	120−130	95−100
medium / 1080p	70−75	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 28% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	30−35	24−27
ultra / 1080p	24−27	20−22
QHD / 1440p	12−14	9−10
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	65−70	50−55
medium / 1080p	35−40	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
medium / 768p	90−95	75−80
high / 1080p	40−45	27−30
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
QHD / 1440p	6−7	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	12−14	9−10
ultra / 1080p	10−11	7−8
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	40−45	27−30
medium / 1080p	16−18	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 41% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	110−120	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	70−75	55−60
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon R7 260.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	35−40	27−30
medium / 1080p	20−22	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 23% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	70−75	50−55
medium / 768p	45−50	30−35
high / 1080p	24−27	18−20
ultra / 1080p	14−16	10−12
4K / 2160p	8−9	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro K2200M.

Full Specs

	Quadro K2200M	Radeon R7 260
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 2.0
Code name	GM107	Bonaire
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	19 July 2014	17 December 2013
Pipelines	640	768
Core clock speed	667 MHz
Boost Clock		1100 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	26.68	48.00
Floating-point performance	853.8 gflops	1,536 gflops
Length		170 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	104 GB/s
DirectX	12
Shader Model	5	6.3
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	5.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		240 Mh/s
Optimus	+
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DisplayPort support		+
DDMA audio		+
Display Port	1.2
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
nView Display Management	+
		Check Price

Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R7 260

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares