Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R7 Carrizo
In this comparison between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 Carrizo you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2200M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 Carrizo will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon R7 Carrizo is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 Carrizo is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 Carrizo here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon R7 Carrizo | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 12-35 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 441% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 Carrizo.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 Carrizo - in Laptops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 Carrizo - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
- Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 Carrizo are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 355% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 416% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 200% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 263% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 184% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 380% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 344% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon R7 Carrizo | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.2/2.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Carrizo |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 19 July 2014 | 4 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 667 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 800 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2410 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.68 | |
| Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |