Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R7 M370
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 M370. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 M370. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon R7 M370 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M370 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M370 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M370 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M370 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M370 - in Laptops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M370 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M370 is 208 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 M370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 4012 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M370.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 215% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 188% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 142% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 128% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 155% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 207% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 36% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon R7 M370 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
| Code name | GM107 | Litho |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 19 July 2014 | 6 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 875 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 73.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 70 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |