Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R7 M465
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 M465, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K2200M stacks up against Radeon R7 M465, check out specs charts below.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon R7 M465 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M465 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M465 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon R7 M465 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M465 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 M465 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M465 - in Laptops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M465 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465 is 158 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M and Radeon R7 M465 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 1012 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 272% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | − |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 333% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 157% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 145% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 380% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M465. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M465. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon R7 M465 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
Code name | GM107 | Litho XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 19 July 2014 | 1 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 825 MHz |
Boost Clock | 960 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 27.00 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |