Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R9 M275
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M275. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M275. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M275 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M275 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 258 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M275 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 512 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 287% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 412% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 104% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 580% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 237% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 344% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 184% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
| Code name | GM107 | Venus |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 19 July 2014 | 1 August 2014 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 122 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |