Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R9 M280X
When comparing Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M280X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M280X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon R9 M280X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M280X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M280X here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M280X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M280X - in Laptops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M280X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M280X is 233 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M280X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 380% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 355% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M280X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 420% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 217% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 255% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 380% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 52% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 228% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 312% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
| Code name | GM107 | Saturn XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 19 July 2014 | 1 February 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | Not Listed | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |