Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R9 M385
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M385, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K2200M stacks up against Radeon R9 M385, check out specs charts below.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon R9 M385 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon R9 M385 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M385 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M385 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385 - in Laptops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M385 - with GCN.
- Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M385 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 3512 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 81% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 37% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 73% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 61% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 56% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 88% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 61% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 83% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon R9 M385 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
| Code name | GM107 | Strato |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 19 July 2014 | 16 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 667 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 56.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |