Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R9 M395X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M395X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M395X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon R9 M395X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 284% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M395X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M395X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395X is 56 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M395X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 3762 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 22% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 23% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 24% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 18% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 17% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 8% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 28% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon R9 M395X | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3 |
| Code name | GM107 | Amethyst XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 19 July 2014 | 16 October 2014 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 92.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 413 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |