Quadro K2200M vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K2200M and Radeon RX 460 mobile. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon RX 460 mobile. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 18% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - in Laptops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
- Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 988 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 17% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K2200M and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 19% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 17% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon RX 460 mobile | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
| Code name | GM107 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 19 July 2014 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 667 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 66.08 |
| Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 2,115 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |