Quadro K2200M vs Radeon RX 480 mobile
In this comparison between Quadro K2200M and Radeon RX 480 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2200M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 480 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon RX 480 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 480 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 480 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon RX 480 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon RX 480 mobile has 53% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon RX 480 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon RX 480 mobile has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - in Laptops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - with Polaris.
- Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 480 mobile is 2988 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 51% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro K2200M and Radeon RX 480 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 22% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 62% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 42% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 52% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 39% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon RX 480 mobile | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 19 July 2014 | 1 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 640 | 2304 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1077 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 155.1 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 4,963 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |