Quadro K2200M vs Tesla C2070

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K2200M and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K2200M stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.

Quadro K2200M

Tesla C2070

Main Specs

	Quadro K2200M	Tesla C2070
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI

Tesla C2070 has 266% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 93 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 2024 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	9−10
QHD / 1440p	6−7	3−4
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	35−40	30−35
medium / 1080p	24−27	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 17% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	30−35	27−30
ultra / 1080p	27−30	21−24
QHD / 1440p	10−12	6−7
4K / 2160p	7−8	5−6
low / 720p	65−70	55−60
medium / 1080p	35−40	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K2200M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	210−220
medium / 768p	200−210	180−190
ultra / 1080p	110−120	100−110
QHD / 1440p	85−90	60−65
4K / 2160p	45−50	30−35
high / 768p	160−170	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	40−45
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	100−110	100−110
ultra / 1080p	75−80	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	24−27	20−22
ultra / 1080p	21−24	18−20
QHD / 1440p	18−20	18−20
4K / 2160p	7−8	6−7
low / 720p	50−55	40−45
medium / 1080p	24−27	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 19% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	30−35	27−30
ultra / 1080p	24−27	21−24
QHD / 1440p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	120−130	100−110
medium / 1080p	70−75	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 17% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	30−35	27−30
ultra / 1080p	24−27	21−24
QHD / 1440p	12−14	10−11
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	65−70	55−60
medium / 1080p	35−40	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	90−95	80−85
high / 1080p	40−45	30−35
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
QHD / 1440p	6−7	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	12−14	10−11
ultra / 1080p	10−11	8−9
4K / 2160p	2−3	1−2
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	16−18	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2070.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	14−16	12−14
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	35−40	30−35
medium / 1080p	20−22	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
medium / 768p	45−50	35−40
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2070.

Full Specs

	Quadro K2200M	Tesla C2070
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Code name	GM107	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	19 July 2014	25 July 2011
Pipelines	640	448
Core clock speed	667 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	26.68	32.14
Floating-point performance	853.8 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length		248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	2988 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	143.4 GB/s
DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.0	2.0
Optimus	+
Display Port	1.2
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
nView Display Management	+

Quadro K2200M vs Tesla C2070

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares