Quadro K2200M vs Tesla C2075
When choosing between Quadro K2200M and Tesla C2075, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K2200M and Tesla C2075.
Quadro K2200M
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
65 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 280% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 93 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 1880 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
QHD / 1440p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
35−40
medium / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
10−12
6−7
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
low / 720p
65−70
55−60
medium / 1080p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro K2200M and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
210−220
medium / 768p
200−210
190−200
ultra / 1080p
110−120
100−110
QHD / 1440p
85−90
65−70
4K / 2160p
45−50
30−35
high / 768p
160−170
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
75−80
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 13% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
70−75
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 12% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
12−14
10−11
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
60−65
medium / 1080p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
90−95
80−85
high / 1080p
40−45
30−35
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
QHD / 1440p
6−7
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−12
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2075.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
20−22
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2075.
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GM107
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
19 July 2014
25 July 2011
Pipelines
640
448
Core clock speed
667 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
26.68
32.14
Floating-point performance
853.8 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
5.0
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
