Quadro K2200M vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
When choosing between Quadro K2200M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K2200M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
Quadro K2200M
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 52% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro K2200M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 13% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 44% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 35% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 34% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 9% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 31% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 43% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GM107 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 19 July 2014 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro K2200M vs FirePro S9050
- Quadro K2200M vs GRID M60 8Q
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs FirePro S9050
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GRID M60 8Q
- Quadro K2200M vs GeForce GTX 950
- Quadro K2200M vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100