FirePro R5000 vs Quadro K3000M
In this comparison between FirePro R5000 and Quadro K3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro R5000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro R5000
Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro R5000 has 366% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
FirePro R5000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K3000M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro R5000.
FirePro R5000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro R5000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro R5000 is 171 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
FirePro R5000 and Quadro K3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro R5000 is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
7−8
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
18−20
medium / 1080p
16−18
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
12−14
ultra / 1080p
18−20
10−12
QHD / 1440p
5−6
0−1
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
45−50
27−30
medium / 1080p
24−27
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro R5000 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
190−200
140−150
medium / 768p
160−170
120−130
ultra / 1080p
90−95
55−60
QHD / 1440p
50−55
30−35
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
130−140
90−95
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
medium / 768p
85−90
65−70
ultra / 1080p
55−60
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
9−10
ultra / 1080p
14−16
8−9
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
35−40
21−24
medium / 1080p
16−18
10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Far Cry 5 is 63% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
10−12
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
90−95
65−70
medium / 1080p
45−50
27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Fortnite is 41% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
14−16
ultra / 1080p
18−20
12−14
QHD / 1440p
7−8
2−3
low / 720p
45−50
27−30
medium / 1080p
24−27
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
80−85
55−60
medium / 768p
70−75
50−55
high / 1080p
24−27
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−12
7−8
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 42% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
8−9
5−6
ultra / 1080p
6−7
3−4
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−12
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
100−110
80−85
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Minecraft is 14% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
14−16
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 45% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
27−30
medium / 768p
30−33
18−20
high / 1080p
16−18
10−11
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
95−100
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
30−35
21−24
high / 768p
50−55
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro R5000 in World of Tanks is 27% more, than Quadro K3000M.
Full Specs
FirePro R5000
Quadro K3000M
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Code name
Pitcairn
N14E-Q1
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
25 February 2013
1 June 2012
Pipelines
768
576
Core clock speed
825 MHz
654 MHz
Transistor count
2,800 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
39.60
31.39
Floating-point performance
1,267 gflops
753.4 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
3200 MHz
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Form factor
full height / full length
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price