FirePro S7150 vs Quadro K3000M
When choosing between FirePro S7150 and Quadro K3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7150 and Quadro K3000M.
FirePro S7150
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Quadro K3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7150 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K3000M.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 266 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
- FirePro S7150 and Quadro K3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 2200 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 229% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Quadro K3000M | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tonga | N14E-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 1 February 2016 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 654 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 31.39 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 753.4 gflops |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |