FirePro S9050 vs Quadro K3000M
When comparing FirePro S9050 and Quadro K3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9050 and Quadro K3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9050
Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
12 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro S9050 has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
FirePro S9050 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
FirePro S9050 has 8 GB more memory, than Quadro K3000M.
FirePro S9050 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 246 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
FirePro S9050 and Quadro K3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 2700 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
7−8
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
18−20
medium / 1080p
24−27
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
30−35
12−14
ultra / 1080p
27−30
10−12
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
27−30
medium / 1080p
35−40
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Battlefield 5 is 156% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
230−240
140−150
medium / 768p
200−210
120−130
ultra / 1080p
110−120
55−60
QHD / 1440p
85−90
30−35
4K / 2160p
45−50
27−30
high / 768p
160−170
90−95
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 77% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
120−130
85−90
medium / 768p
100−110
65−70
ultra / 1080p
80−85
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Dota 2 is 62% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
9−10
ultra / 1080p
21−24
8−9
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
27−30
10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Far Cry 5 is 145% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
30−35
16−18
ultra / 1080p
24−27
10−12
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
120−130
65−70
medium / 1080p
70−75
27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Fortnite is 103% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
30−35
14−16
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
QHD / 1440p
12−14
2−3
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
27−30
medium / 1080p
35−40
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
100−110
55−60
medium / 768p
90−95
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
7−8
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
5−6
ultra / 1080p
10−11
3−4
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
14−16
medium / 1080p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Metro Exodus is 185% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
120−130
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
110−120
95−100
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
14−16
medium / 1080p
20−22
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 109% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
70−75
27−30
medium / 768p
45−50
18−20
high / 1080p
24−27
10−11
ultra / 1080p
14−16
7−8
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 135% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
40−45
21−24
high / 768p
55−60
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Quadro K3000M.
Full Specs
FirePro S9050
Quadro K3000M
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Code name
Tahiti
N14E-Q1
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
7 August 2014
1 June 2012
Pipelines
1792
576
Core clock speed
900 MHz
654 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
100.8
31.39
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
753.4 gflops
Length
254 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Form factor
full height / full length
Check Price
Check Price