FirePro V7900 vs Quadro K3000M
When comparing FirePro V7900 and Quadro K3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V7900 and Quadro K3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V7900
Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
151 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V7900 has 101% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
FirePro V7900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K3000M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V7900.
FirePro V7900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 71 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 2200 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−12
7−8
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
14−16
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
20−22
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Battlefield 5 is 43% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro V7900 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
180−190
140−150
medium / 768p
150−160
120−130
ultra / 1080p
75−80
55−60
QHD / 1440p
45−50
30−35
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
110−120
90−95
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−33
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
95−100
85−90
medium / 768p
80−85
65−70
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
9−10
ultra / 1080p
12−14
8−9
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
30−33
21−24
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Far Cry 5 is 36% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
low / 720p
80−85
65−70
medium / 1080p
35−40
27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Fortnite is 25% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
QHD / 1440p
5−6
2−3
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
high / 1080p
21−24
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Grand Theft Auto V is 24% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
7−8
5−6
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
9−10
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Metro Exodus is 57% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
90−95
80−85
medium / 1080p
100−105
95−100
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
40−45
27−30
medium / 768p
24−27
18−20
high / 1080p
14−16
10−11
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 35% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
95−100
85−90
medium / 768p
55−60
45−50
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
high / 768p
45−50
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Quadro K3000M.
Full Specs
FirePro V7900
Quadro K3000M
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Kepler
Code name
Cayman
N14E-Q1
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
24 May 2011
1 June 2012
Pipelines
1280
576
Core clock speed
725 MHz
654 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
58.00
31.39
Floating-point performance
1,856.0 gflops
753.4 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
171 Mh/s
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
DisplayPort count
4
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price