Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro W4190M vs Quadro K3000M

    When comparing FirePro W4190M and Quadro K3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4190M and Quadro K3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    FirePro W4190M Check Price
    Quadro K3000M Check Price

    FirePro W4190M and Quadro K3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: FirePro W4190M and Quadro K3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M or Quadro K3000M here:

    FirePro W4190M Laptops
    Quadro K3000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro W4190M Quadro K3000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 MXM-B (3.0)
    Supplementary power connectors None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
    • Quadro K3000M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
    • Both cards are used in Laptops.
    • FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
    • Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 171 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
    • FirePro W4190M and Quadro K3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 1200 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 3−4 7−8
    ultra / 1080p 1−2 4−5
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 14−16 18−20
    medium / 1080p 5−6 9−10
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than FirePro W4190M.

    Full Specs

      FirePro W4190M Quadro K3000M
    Architecture GCN Kepler
    Code name Mars XTX? N14E-Q1
    Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 12 November 2015 1 June 2012
    Pipelines 384 576
    Core clock speed 825 MHz 654 MHz
    Boost Clock 900 MHz
    Transistor count 950 million 3,540 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 21.60 31.39
    Floating-point performance 691.2 gflops 753.4 gflops
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 2800 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 64 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 12 (11_0)
    Shader Model 5.1 5.1
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.2.131 1.1.126
    CUDA +
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 24 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized large
    Optimus +
    AppAcceleration +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares