FirePro W8100 vs Quadro K3000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W8100 and Quadro K3000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W8100 and Quadro K3000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W8100
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Quadro K3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 193% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K3000M.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 170 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
- FirePro W8100 and Quadro K3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 2200 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 331% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 229% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 190% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Quadro K3000M | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Hawaii | N14E-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2014 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 654 MHz |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 31.39 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 753.4 gflops |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | 24 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |