FirePro W9000 vs Quadro K3000M
In this comparison between FirePro W9000 and Quadro K3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W9000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W9000
Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W9000 has 366% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
FirePro W9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
FirePro W9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K3000M.
FirePro W9000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 321 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
FirePro W9000 and Quadro K3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W9000 is 2700 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
7−8
ultra / 1080p
21−24
4−5
QHD / 1440p
16−18
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
18−20
medium / 1080p
40−45
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
55−60
12−14
ultra / 1080p
45−50
10−12
QHD / 1440p
35−40
0−1
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
100−110
27−30
medium / 1080p
60−65
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
250−260
140−150
medium / 768p
220−230
120−130
ultra / 1080p
180−190
55−60
QHD / 1440p
110−120
30−35
4K / 2160p
70−75
27−30
high / 768p
210−220
90−95
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
120−130
85−90
medium / 768p
110−120
65−70
ultra / 1080p
100−110
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
45−50
9−10
ultra / 1080p
40−45
8−9
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
4−5
low / 720p
80−85
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
60−65
16−18
ultra / 1080p
45−50
10−12
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
65−70
medium / 1080p
110−120
27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Fortnite is 229% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
60−65
14−16
ultra / 1080p
45−50
12−14
QHD / 1440p
30−35
2−3
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
27−30
medium / 1080p
65−70
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
140−150
55−60
medium / 768p
120−130
50−55
high / 1080p
70−75
14−16
ultra / 1080p
30−35
7−8
QHD / 1440p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
5−6
ultra / 1080p
20−22
3−4
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
65−70
14−16
medium / 1080p
30−35
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
130−140
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
120−130
95−100
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
8−9
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
14−16
medium / 1080p
35−40
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
130−140
27−30
medium / 768p
85−90
18−20
high / 1080p
45−50
10−11
ultra / 1080p
24−27
7−8
4K / 2160p
16−18
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
50−55
21−24
high / 768p
60−65
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W9000 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Quadro K3000M.
Full Specs
FirePro W9000
Quadro K3000M
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Code name
Tahiti
N14E-Q1
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
14 June 2012
1 June 2012
Pipelines
2048
576
Core clock speed
975 MHz
654 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
124.8
31.39
Floating-point performance
3,994 gflops
753.4 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
460 Mh/s
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price