FireStream 9370 vs Quadro K3000M
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and Quadro K3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro K3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9370 and Quadro K3000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 171 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 1800 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9370 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 54% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 38% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 45% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro K3000M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Code name | Cypress | N14E-Q1 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 654 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 31.39 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 753.4 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |