GeForce GT 440 vs Quadro K3000M
When choosing between GeForce GT 440 and Quadro K3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 440 and Quadro K3000M.
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 440
Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
65 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K3000M has 15% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 440.
GeForce GT 440 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce GT 440 has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro K3000M.
GeForce GT 440 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GT 440 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GT 440 is 966 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
GeForce GT 440 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 1200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 440.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
18−20
medium / 1080p
0−1
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 440 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
60−65
140−150
medium / 768p
27−30
120−130
ultra / 1080p
7−8
55−60
QHD / 1440p
−
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
16−18
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 275% more, than GeForce GT 440.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 440 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
10−11
65−70
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Dota 2 is 165% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
−
9−10
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
−
10−11
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 720p
21−24
65−70
medium / 1080p
0−1
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
0−1
16−18
low / 768p
18−20
55−60
medium / 768p
−
50−55
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
−
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
7−8
low / 768p
75−80
95−100
high / 1080p
27−30
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce GT 440.
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 768p
0−1
27−30
medium / 768p
−
18−20
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
14−16
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
high / 768p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce GT 440.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 440
Quadro K3000M
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Code name
GF108
N14E-Q1
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 February 2011
1 June 2012
Pipelines
96
576
Core clock speed
1620 MHz
654 MHz
Transistor count
585 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
13.0 billion/sec
31.39
Floating-point performance
311.04 gflops
753.4 gflops
Length
5.7" (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
96
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
20 Mh/s
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Standard memory config per GPU
1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB
Check Price
Check Price