GeForce GTS 360M vs Quadro K3000M

In this comparison between GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro K3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 360M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTS 360M Check Price

Quadro K3000M Check Price

GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro K3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro K3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M or Quadro K3000M here:

GeForce GTS 360M Laptops

Quadro K3000M Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTS 360M	Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)	38 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	MXM-II	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K3000M has 97% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 360M.
GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K3000M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 360M.
GeForce GTS 360M is used in Laptops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 782 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	7−8
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	18−20
medium / 1080p	0−1	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	60−65	140−150
medium / 768p	27−30	120−130
ultra / 1080p	7−8	55−60
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	16−18	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 275% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	10−11	65−70
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Dota 2 is 165% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	10−11
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	0−1	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	0−1	16−18
low / 768p	18−20	55−60
medium / 768p	−	50−55
high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p	−	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	7−8
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
high / 1080p	27−30	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 768p	0−1	27−30
medium / 768p	−	18−20
high / 1080p	−	10−11
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	14−16	45−50
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
high / 768p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTS 360M	Quadro K3000M
Architecture	GT2xx	Kepler
Code name	N11E-GS1	N14E-Q1
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	7 January 2010	1 June 2012
Pipelines	96	576
Core clock speed	1436 MHz	654 MHz
Transistor count	727 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	17.60	31.39
Floating-point performance	275.71 gflops	753.4 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed		2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	57.6 GB/s	89.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	+	+
CUDA cores	96
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
SLI options	+
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		24 Mh/s
Laptop size	large	large
Optimus		+
Gigaflops	413
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management	8.0
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 360M vs Quadro K3000M

GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro K3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares