GeForce GTX 275 vs Quadro K3000M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 275 and Quadro K3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 275 and Quadro K3000M.
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
219 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 275 has 192% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
GeForce GTX 275 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 275 has 892 GB more memory, than Quadro K3000M.
GeForce GTX 275 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 750 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 1666 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
7−8
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
18−20
medium / 1080p
8−9
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
10−12
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 275 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
140−150
medium / 768p
100−110
120−130
ultra / 1080p
50−55
55−60
QHD / 1440p
27−30
30−35
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
75−80
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
75−80
85−90
medium / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
8−9
9−10
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
8−9
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−12
low / 720p
60−65
65−70
medium / 1080p
21−24
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Fortnite is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
QHD / 1440p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
12−14
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
50−55
55−60
medium / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
4−5
5−6
ultra / 1080p
3−4
3−4
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
high / 1080p
85−90
90−95
ultra / 1080p
80−85
80−85
medium / 1080p
90−95
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
10−12
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−12
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
24−27
27−30
medium / 768p
16−18
18−20
high / 1080p
9−10
10−11
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
medium / 768p
40−45
45−50
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
high / 768p
35−40
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Quadro K3000M
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Kepler
Code name
GT200B
N14E-Q1
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
15 January 2009
1 June 2012
Pipelines
240
576
Core clock speed
1404 MHz
654 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.6 billion/sec
31.39
Floating-point performance
673.9 gflops
753.4 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1134 MHz
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
127.0 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
3.0
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
