GeForce GTX 285 vs Quadro K3000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 285 and Quadro K3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 285 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
204 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 285 has 172% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
GeForce GTX 285 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K3000M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285.
GeForce GTX 285 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 285 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 285 is 822 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 1558 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
7−8
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
18−20
medium / 1080p
9−10
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 285 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
140−150
medium / 768p
110−120
120−130
ultra / 1080p
55−60
55−60
QHD / 1440p
30−35
30−35
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
85−90
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
GeForce GTX 285 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
80−85
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
65−70
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Dota 2 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
8−9
9−10
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
20−22
21−24
medium / 1080p
9−10
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Far Cry 5 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−12
10−12
low / 720p
60−65
65−70
medium / 1080p
24−27
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Fortnite is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
QHD / 1440p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
27−30
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
medium / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
5−6
5−6
ultra / 1080p
3−4
3−4
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
7−8
7−8
GeForce GTX 285 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p
95−100
95−100
high / 1080p
90−95
90−95
ultra / 1080p
80−85
80−85
medium / 1080p
90−95
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Minecraft is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−12
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
24−27
27−30
medium / 768p
16−18
18−20
high / 1080p
10−11
10−11
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
medium / 768p
45−50
45−50
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
high / 768p
35−40
35−40
GeForce GTX 285 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Quadro K3000M
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Kepler
Code name
GT200B
N14E-Q1
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
23 December 2008
1 June 2012
Pipelines
240
576
Core clock speed
1476 MHz
654 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
51.8 billion/sec
31.39
Floating-point performance
708.5 gflops
753.4 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
512 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1242 MHz
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
159.0 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
240
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)
128bit
Check Price
Check Price
