GeForce GTX 460 vs Quadro K3000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 and Quadro K3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460
Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
160 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
6-pin & 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
768 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 460 has 113% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
GeForce GTX 460 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 460 has 764 GB more memory, than Quadro K3000M.
GeForce GTX 460 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 460 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 is 21 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
GeForce GTX 460 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 is 800 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−12
7−8
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
14−16
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
16−18
10−12
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
20−22
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 460 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
180−190
140−150
medium / 768p
150−160
120−130
ultra / 1080p
75−80
55−60
QHD / 1440p
45−50
30−35
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
110−120
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
95−100
85−90
medium / 768p
80−85
65−70
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
9−10
ultra / 1080p
12−14
8−9
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
30−33
21−24
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Far Cry 5 is 36% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
low / 720p
80−85
65−70
medium / 1080p
40−45
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Fortnite is 29% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
20−22
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
5−6
2−3
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
high / 1080p
21−24
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 24% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
7−8
5−6
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−11
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Metro Exodus is 57% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
95−100
80−85
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 36% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
40−45
27−30
medium / 768p
24−27
18−20
high / 1080p
14−16
10−11
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
95−100
85−90
medium / 768p
55−60
45−50
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
high / 768p
45−50
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Quadro K3000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460
Quadro K3000M
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Code name
GF104
N14E-Q1
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
12 July 2010
1 June 2012
Pipelines
336
576
Core clock speed
675 MHz
654 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
37.80
31.39
Floating-point performance
907.2 gflops
753.4 gflops
Length
8.25"(210 mm) (21 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
3600 MHz
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
Bus support
16x PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
66 Mh/s
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price