GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs Quadro K3000M
When comparing GeForce GTX 485M SLI and Quadro K3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 485M SLI and Quadro K3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 485M SLI and Quadro K3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 485M SLI and Quadro K3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 485M SLI or Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2x2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 485M SLI has 33% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
Quadro K3000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 485M SLI.
GeForce GTX 485M SLI is used in Laptops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 485M SLI is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 79 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M SLI.
GeForce GTX 485M SLI is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 1300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
7−8
ultra / 1080p
21−24
4−5
QHD / 1440p
16−18
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
18−20
medium / 1080p
40−45
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
55−60
12−14
ultra / 1080p
45−50
10−12
QHD / 1440p
35−40
0−1
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
100−110
27−30
medium / 1080p
60−65
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
250−260
140−150
medium / 768p
220−230
120−130
ultra / 1080p
180−190
55−60
QHD / 1440p
110−120
30−35
4K / 2160p
70−75
27−30
high / 768p
210−220
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
120−130
85−90
medium / 768p
110−120
65−70
ultra / 1080p
100−110
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M SLI in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
45−50
9−10
ultra / 1080p
40−45
8−9
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
4−5
low / 720p
80−85
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
60−65
16−18
ultra / 1080p
45−50
10−12
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
65−70
medium / 1080p
110−120
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M SLI in Fortnite is 229% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
60−65
14−16
ultra / 1080p
45−50
12−14
QHD / 1440p
30−35
2−3
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
27−30
medium / 1080p
65−70
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
140−150
55−60
medium / 768p
120−130
50−55
high / 1080p
70−75
14−16
ultra / 1080p
30−35
7−8
QHD / 1440p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
5−6
ultra / 1080p
20−22
3−4
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
65−70
14−16
medium / 1080p
30−35
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M SLI in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
130−140
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
120−130
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M SLI in Minecraft is 34% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
8−9
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
14−16
medium / 1080p
35−40
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
130−140
27−30
medium / 768p
85−90
18−20
high / 1080p
45−50
10−11
ultra / 1080p
24−27
7−8
4K / 2160p
16−18
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
50−55
21−24
high / 768p
60−65
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M SLI in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Quadro K3000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
Quadro K3000M
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Code name
N11E-GTX-A1
N14E-Q1
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
6 January 2011
1 June 2012
Pipelines
768
576
Core clock speed
575 MHz
654 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
31.39
Floating-point performance
753.4 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1500 MHz
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price