GRID M10 8Q vs Quadro K3000M
When comparing GRID M10 8Q and Quadro K3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Quadro K3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M10 8Q
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro K3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K3000M.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 379 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
- GRID M10 8Q and Quadro K3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 63% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 41% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 39% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 45% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro K3000M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM107 | N14E-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 654 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 31.39 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 753.4 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |