GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro K3000M
In this comparison between GRID M60 8Q and Quadro K3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 8Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Quadro K3000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K3000M.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 97 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q and Quadro K3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 2212 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 156% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 77% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 59% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 136% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 103% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 171% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 109% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 135% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Quadro K3000M. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Quadro K3000M | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GM204 | N14E-Q1 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 576 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 654 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 31.39 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 753.4 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |