Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro K3000M

When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro K3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro K3000M.

Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro K3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro K3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 or Quadro K3000M here:

Main Specs

  Iris Plus Graphics 645 Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type DDR3/DDR4 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
  Check Price Check Price
  • Quadro K3000M has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
  • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
  • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
  • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
  • Core clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 354 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
  • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 4−5 7−8
ultra / 1080p 2−3 4−5
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 12−14 18−20
medium / 1080p 5−6 9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.

Full Specs

  Iris Plus Graphics 645 Quadro K3000M
Architecture Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake Kepler
Code name Kaby Lake GT3e N14E-Q1
Type Laptop Mobile workstation
Release date 10 July 2019 1 June 2012
Pipelines 48 576
Core clock speed 300 MHz 654 MHz
Boost Clock 1150 MHz
Transistor count 3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 50.40 31.39
Floating-point performance 753.4 gflops
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth 89.6 GB/s
Shared memory + -
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 6.4 5.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.103 1.1.126
CUDA +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 24 Mh/s
Laptop size large
Optimus +
Quick Sync +
  Check Price Check Price