Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro K3000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K3000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 650 stacks up against Quadro K3000M, check out specs charts below.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 or Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K3000M has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 28 GB more memory, than Quadro K3000M.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 354 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
7−8
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−11
9−10
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
150−160
140−150
medium / 768p
120−130
120−130
ultra / 1080p
60−65
55−60
QHD / 1440p
35−40
30−35
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
90−95
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
medium / 768p
65−70
65−70
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
9−10
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−11
10−11
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
low / 720p
65−70
65−70
medium / 1080p
27−30
27−30
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
QHD / 1440p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
medium / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 3% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
5−6
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
14−16
medium / 1080p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
95−100
95−100
high / 1080p
90−95
90−95
ultra / 1080p
85−90
80−85
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 1% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
30−35
27−30
medium / 768p
20−22
18−20
high / 1080p
10−12
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
45−50
45−50
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
high / 768p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro K3000M.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Quadro K3000M
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Kepler
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
N14E-Q1
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
3 January 2017
1 June 2012
Pipelines
48
576
Core clock speed
300 MHz
654 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
55.20
31.39
Floating-point performance
883 gflops
753.4 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
