Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs Quadro K3000M
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU and Quadro K3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU and Quadro K3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU and Quadro K3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU and Quadro K3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU or Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is used in Laptops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 354 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
7−8
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−12
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
160−170
140−150
medium / 768p
130−140
120−130
ultra / 1080p
65−70
55−60
QHD / 1440p
35−40
30−35
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
100−110
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
70−75
65−70
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
10−12
9−10
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
24−27
21−24
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
low / 720p
70−75
65−70
medium / 1080p
30−35
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Fortnite is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 13% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
medium / 768p
55−60
50−55
high / 1080p
18−20
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
5−6
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
14−16
medium / 1080p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
high / 1080p
95−100
90−95
ultra / 1080p
85−90
80−85
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 4% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
30−35
27−30
medium / 768p
21−24
18−20
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
high / 768p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
Quadro K3000M
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Kepler
Code name
Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11
N14E-Q1
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
28 May 2019
1 June 2012
Pipelines
48
576
Core clock speed
300 MHz
654 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
10 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
31.39
Floating-point performance
753.4 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
DirectX 12_1
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
