Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro K3000M
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro K3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro K3000M.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro K3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro K3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
System Shared
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K3000M has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 354 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
7−8
ultra / 1080p
3−4
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
18−20
medium / 1080p
5−6
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
27−30
medium / 1080p
8−9
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
110−120
140−150
medium / 768p
85−90
120−130
ultra / 1080p
40−45
55−60
QHD / 1440p
24−27
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
60−65
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
85−90
medium / 768p
45−50
65−70
ultra / 1080p
24−27
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
9−10
ultra / 1080p
5−6
8−9
4K / 2160p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
21−24
medium / 1080p
6−7
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
low / 720p
50−55
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Fortnite is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
18−20
27−30
medium / 1080p
10−11
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 53% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
40−45
55−60
medium / 768p
35−40
50−55
high / 1080p
8−9
14−16
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
5−6
ultra / 1080p
2−3
3−4
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
14−16
medium / 1080p
5−6
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
high / 1080p
80−85
90−95
ultra / 1080p
70−75
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Minecraft is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
16−18
27−30
medium / 768p
12−14
18−20
high / 1080p
7−8
10−11
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
80−85
85−90
medium / 768p
35−40
45−50
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
high / 768p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro K3000M
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Kepler
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
N14E-Q1
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 June 2015
1 June 2012
Pipelines
48
576
Core clock speed
300 MHz
654 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
31.39
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
753.4 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
