Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro K3000M
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro K3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics P580 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro K3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro K3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 or Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
64 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K3000M has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 60 GB more memory, than Quadro K3000M.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 304 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−11
7−8
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
12−14
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
12−14
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
170−180
140−150
medium / 768p
140−150
120−130
ultra / 1080p
70−75
55−60
QHD / 1440p
40−45
30−35
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
100−110
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
75−80
65−70
ultra / 1080p
45−50
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
10−12
9−10
ultra / 1080p
10−12
8−9
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
27−30
21−24
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Far Cry 5 is 18% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
low / 720p
75−80
65−70
medium / 1080p
35−40
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 16% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
QHD / 1440p
4−5
2−3
low / 720p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
medium / 768p
55−60
50−55
high / 1080p
18−20
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
5−6
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
14−16
medium / 1080p
9−10
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
90−95
80−85
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
20−22
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
35−40
27−30
medium / 768p
21−24
18−20
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
high / 768p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Quadro K3000M
Architecture
Gen. 9 Skylake
Kepler
Code name
Skylake GT4e
N14E-Q1
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 September 2015
1 June 2012
Pipelines
72
576
Core clock speed
350 MHz
654 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
75.60
31.39
Floating-point performance
753.4 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.97
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
