NVS 510 vs Quadro K3000M

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between NVS 510 and Quadro K3000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the NVS 510 stacks up against Quadro K3000M, check out specs charts below.

NVS 510 Check Price

Quadro K3000M Check Price

Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:

Quadro K3000M Laptops

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K3000M has 114% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K3000M has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 510 and Quadro K3000M are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 143 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
NVS 510 and Quadro K3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 1018 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	7−8
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	18−20
medium / 1080p	0−1	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	60−65	140−150
medium / 768p	27−30	120−130
ultra / 1080p	7−8	55−60
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	16−18	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 275% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	10−11	65−70
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Dota 2 is 165% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	10−11
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	0−1	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Fortnite is 204% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	0−1	16−18
low / 768p	18−20	55−60
medium / 768p	−	50−55
high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	7−8
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
high / 1080p	27−30	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Minecraft is 79% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 768p	0−1	27−30
medium / 768p	−	18−20
high / 1080p	−	10−11
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	14−16	45−50
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
high / 768p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in World of Tanks is 128% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro K3000M
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	N14E-Q1
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	1 June 2012
Pipelines	192	576
Core clock speed	797 MHz	654 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	31.39
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops	753.4 gflops
Length	160 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	89.6 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s	24 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Quadro K3000M

Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares