Quadro 2000D vs Quadro K3000M
In this comparison between Quadro 2000D and Quadro K3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000D will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000D
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Quadro K3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K3000M has 20% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K3000M has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 29 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 2000D and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Fortnite is 63% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Quadro K3000M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | GF106 | N14E-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 5 October 2011 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 654 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 31.39 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 753.4 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | 24 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |