Quadro 5000 vs Quadro K3000M

In this comparison between Quadro 5000 and Quadro K3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 5000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro 5000 Check Price

Quadro K3000M Check Price

Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:

Quadro K3000M Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro 5000	Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)	152 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2.5 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 5000 has 102% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
Quadro 5000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K3000M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 5000.
Quadro 5000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
Quadro 5000 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 141 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000.
Quadro 5000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro 5000 is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	9−10	7−8
ultra / 1080p	5−6	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	18−20
medium / 1080p	12−14	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	16−18	12−14
ultra / 1080p	14−16	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	27−30
medium / 1080p	16−18	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000 in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro 5000 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	160−170	140−150
medium / 768p	130−140	120−130
ultra / 1080p	70−75	55−60
QHD / 1440p	40−45	30−35
4K / 2160p	30−33	27−30
high / 768p	100−110	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	27−30	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	90−95	85−90
medium / 768p	70−75	65−70
ultra / 1080p	45−50	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	10−12	9−10
ultra / 1080p	10−11	8−9
4K / 2160p	4−5	4−5
low / 720p	24−27	21−24
medium / 1080p	12−14	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	18−20	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−12
low / 720p	75−80	65−70
medium / 1080p	30−35	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000 in Fortnite is 12% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	16−18	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
QHD / 1440p	4−5	2−3
low / 720p	35−40	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	65−70	55−60
medium / 768p	55−60	50−55
high / 1080p	18−20	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	6−7	5−6
ultra / 1080p	4−5	3−4
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	14−16
medium / 1080p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	100−110	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	90−95	80−85
medium / 1080p	95−100	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	18−20	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	35−40
medium / 1080p	20−22	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	14−16
medium / 1080p	12−14	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	35−40	27−30
medium / 768p	21−24	18−20
high / 1080p	12−14	10−11
ultra / 1080p	8−9	7−8
4K / 2160p	7−8	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	90−95	85−90
medium / 768p	50−55	45−50
ultra / 1080p	24−27	21−24
high / 768p	40−45	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M.

Full Specs

	Quadro 5000	Quadro K3000M
Architecture	Fermi	Kepler
Code name	GF100	N14E-Q1
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	23 February 2011	1 June 2012
Pipelines	352	576
Core clock speed	513 MHz	654 MHz
Transistor count	3,100 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	22.57	31.39
Floating-point performance	722.3 gflops	753.4 gflops
Length	248 mm
Memory bus width	320 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3000 MHz	2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	120.0 GB/s	89.6 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	2.0	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	66 Mh/s	24 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 5000 vs Quadro K3000M

Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares