Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K3000M
When comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro K3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro K3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 3800
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Quadro K3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 44% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K3000M has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 54 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 1200 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Battlefield 5 is 350% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Far Cry 5 is 366% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Fortnite is 108% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Metro Exodus is 1400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Minecraft is 35% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 650% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 533% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in World of Tanks is 41% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Quadro K3000M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GT200B | N14E-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 654 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 31.39 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 753.4 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |