Quadro K3000M vs Quadro P2000
In this comparison between Quadro K3000M and Quadro P2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K3000M will be the best choice, for others Quadro P2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K3000M
Quadro P2000
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
5 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
Quadro K3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro P2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro P2000 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro K3000M.
Quadro K3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro P2000 - in Desktops.
Quadro K3000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 422 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Quadro K3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 4208 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
35−40
ultra / 1080p
4−5
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 330% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
55−60
ultra / 1080p
10−12
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 337% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
140−150
250−260
medium / 768p
120−130
220−230
ultra / 1080p
55−60
180−190
QHD / 1440p
30−35
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
90−95
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
medium / 768p
65−70
110−120
ultra / 1080p
35−40
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
45−50
ultra / 1080p
8−9
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
80−85
medium / 1080p
10−11
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 336% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
50−55
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
65−70
180−190
medium / 1080p
27−30
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 232% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
2−3
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
27−30
110−120
medium / 1080p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 333% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
140−150
medium / 768p
50−55
130−140
high / 1080p
14−16
70−75
ultra / 1080p
7−8
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 190% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
9−10
low / 720p
14−16
70−75
medium / 1080p
7−8
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 457% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
95−100
130−140
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
14−16
70−75
medium / 1080p
10−12
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 281% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
27−30
130−140
medium / 768p
18−20
85−90
high / 1080p
10−11
50−55
ultra / 1080p
7−8
27−30
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 357% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
55−60
high / 768p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Quadro K3000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K3000M
Quadro P2000
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Code name
N14E-Q1
GP106
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 June 2012
6 February 2017
Pipelines
576
1024
Core clock speed
654 MHz
1076 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
16 nm
Texture fill rate
31.39
94.72
Floating-point performance
753.4 gflops
3,031 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
160 Bit
Memory clock speed
2800 MHz
7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
140.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.19 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price