Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro K3000M vs Quadro T2000 Max Q

    When choosing between Quadro K3000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K3000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q.
    Quadro K3000M Check Price
    Quadro T2000 Max Q Check Price

    Quadro K3000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: Quadro K3000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M or Quadro T2000 Max Q here:

    Quadro K3000M Laptops
    Quadro T2000 Max Q Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro K3000M Quadro T2000 Max Q
    Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 40 Watt
    Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro K3000M has 87% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
    • Quadro K3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro T2000 Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro K3000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
    • Both cards are used in Laptops.
    • Quadro K3000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - with Turing.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 276 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
    • Quadro K3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 5200 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 7−8 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 4−5 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 18−20 60−65
    medium / 1080p 9−10 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Quadro K3000M.

    Full Specs

      Quadro K3000M Quadro T2000 Max Q
    Architecture Kepler Turing
    Code name N14E-Q1 N19P-Q3 MAX-Q
    Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 1 June 2012 27 May 2019
    Pipelines 576 1024
    Core clock speed 654 MHz 930 / 1200 MHz
    Boost Clock 1500 / 1620 MHz
    Transistor count 3,540 million 4,700 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 12 nm
    Texture fill rate 31.39 103.7
    Floating-point performance 753.4 gflops
    Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 2800 MHz 8000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 89.6 GB/s 128.0 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (12_1)
    Shader Model 5.1 6.5
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2.131
    CUDA + 7.5
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 24 Mh/s
    Laptop size large medium sized
    Optimus +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares