Quadro K3000M vs Radeon HD 4870 X2
When comparing Quadro K3000M and Radeon HD 4870 X2, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K3000M and Radeon HD 4870 X2 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 4870 X2
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K3000M | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 286 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 has 281% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
- Quadro K3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon HD 4870 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K3000M has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- Quadro K3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K3000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4870 X2 is 46 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
- Quadro K3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 4870 X2 is 800 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4870 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Fortnite is 24% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 57% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. |
Full Specs
Quadro K3000M | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | N14E-Q1 | R700 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 June 2012 | 12 August 2008 |
Pipelines | 576 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 654 MHz | 700 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.39 | 28.00 |
Floating-point performance | 753.4 gflops | 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |