Quadro K3000M vs Radeon Pro WX 7100
In this comparison between Quadro K3000M and Radeon Pro WX 7100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K3000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 7100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K3000M
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
130 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
8 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro WX 7100 has 73% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
Quadro K3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro WX 7100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon Pro WX 7100 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K3000M.
Quadro K3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro WX 7100 - in Desktops.
Quadro K3000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 7100 - with Polaris.
Quadro K3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 7100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 7100 is 4200 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
35−40
ultra / 1080p
4−5
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 330% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
55−60
ultra / 1080p
10−12
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
27−30
110−120
medium / 1080p
14−16
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Battlefield 5 is 356% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
140−150
250−260
medium / 768p
120−130
220−230
ultra / 1080p
55−60
180−190
QHD / 1440p
30−35
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
90−95
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
medium / 768p
65−70
110−120
ultra / 1080p
35−40
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
45−50
ultra / 1080p
8−9
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
21−24
85−90
medium / 1080p
10−11
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Far Cry 5 is 354% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
50−55
QHD / 1440p
−
30−33
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
65−70
180−190
medium / 1080p
27−30
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Fortnite is 241% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
QHD / 1440p
2−3
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
27−30
110−120
medium / 1080p
16−18
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 346% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
140−150
medium / 768p
50−55
130−140
high / 1080p
14−16
75−80
ultra / 1080p
7−8
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
27−30
ultra / 1080p
3−4
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
9−10
low / 720p
14−16
70−75
medium / 1080p
7−8
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Metro Exodus is 471% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
95−100
130−140
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
14−16
70−75
medium / 1080p
10−12
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 281% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
27−30
130−140
medium / 768p
18−20
90−95
high / 1080p
10−11
50−55
ultra / 1080p
7−8
27−30
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 364% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
55−60
high / 768p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 7100 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Quadro K3000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K3000M
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
N14E-Q1
Polaris 12
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 June 2012
1 March 2017
Pipelines
576
2304
Core clock speed
654 MHz
Boost Clock
1243 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
31.39
179.0
Floating-point performance
753.4 gflops
5,728 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
2800 MHz
7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
224.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
567 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
